Ultrasound Assisted Sonochemical Decomposition of Methyl Orange in the Presence of H2O2 and CCl4

Main Article Content

J. Ara
M. Ashifuzzaman
M. J. Hossain
S. M. A. Razzak
S. Monira
J. Alauddin
M. A. A. Mashud
M. H. Uddin

Abstract

Methyl orange (MO) is an orange azoic dye; which has transition range from 3.1 to 4.4. Sonochemical decomposition of methyl orange in the presence of H2O2 and CCl4 has given effective result to reclaim water from the effluents released by the industries. The aim of this research was to investigate the effective condition for the decomposition of MO in the presence or absence of additives. For this, 50 mg/L solution of MO was sonicated in the presence and absence of different additives. It was clearly confirmed that the rates of sonochemical decomposition of MO increased with increasing the concentration in both cases of H2O2 and CCl4. The combination of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) namely hydrogen per-oxide and carbon tetra-chloride with sonolysis harvests the decomposition of wide spectrum of organic contaminants. The combination of sonolysis with H2O2 and CCl4 enhances the production of non-selective radicals to improve the decomposition process. The AOPs is technically feasible and also economic. Based on the results, it was suggested that the rate of MO decomposition can be effectively enhanced by the sonolysis of CCl4 and also for H2O2. It was possible to include order- MO+200 µL H2O2 > MO+100 µL H2O2 > MO+20 µL H2O2 > MO; MO+200 µL CCl4 > MO+100 µL CCl4 > MO+20 µL CCl4 > MO.

Keywords:
Methyl orange, sonolysis, radical reaction.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ara, J., Ashifuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. J., Razzak, S. M. A., Monira, S., Alauddin, J., Mashud, M. A. A., & Uddin, M. H. (2019). Ultrasound Assisted Sonochemical Decomposition of Methyl Orange in the Presence of H2O2 and CCl4. Asian Journal of Applied Chemistry Research, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajacr/2019/v4i230107
Section
Original Research Article

References

Olsson G. Water and energy: Conflicts and connections. Water. 2012;21:12-4.

Eikebrokk B, Vogt RD, Liltved H. NOM increase in Northern European source waters; discussion of possible causes & impacts on coagulation/contact filtration processes.Water Sci Technol: Water Supply. 2004(4):47-54.

Korth A, Fiebiger C, Bornmann K, Schmidt W. NOM increase in drinking water resorvoirs – relevance for drinking water production. Water Science Technol: Water Supply. 2004;(4):55-60.

Bolton, J.R. Ultraviolet Applications Handbook; Boltons Photoscience Inc. Ayr, ON, Canada; 1999.

Ustun AP, Corvalan C. Preventing disease through healthy environments:towards an estimate of the environmental burden of disease. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Publishers; 2006;1-104

Batterman S. Eisenberg J. Hardin R, Kruk ME. Lemons MC, Michalak AM, et al. Sustainable control of water-related infectious diseases: A review and proposal for interdisciplinary health-based systems research. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117:1023-32.

Kasprzyk-Horden B, Ziolek M, Nawrocki J. Catalytic ozonation & methods of enhancing molecular ozone reactions in water treatment. Appl. Catal., B. 2003; 40:639-669.

Neyens E, Baeyens. A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J. Hazard. Mater.2003;B98:33-50.

Chemical degradation methods for wastes & pollutants: Environmental & industrial applications; Tarr, M. A., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York; 2003.

Bolton JR. Ultraviolet applications handbook; Boltons photoscience Inc.: Ayr, ON, Canada; 1999.

Ollis DF, Pelizzetti E, Serpone N. Photocatalyzed destruction of water contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991; 25:1523-1529.

Venkatadri R, Peters RW. Chemical oxidation technologies: Ultraviolet light/hydrogen peroxide, Fenton's reagent, and titanium dioxide-assisted photocatalysis. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials. 1993;10(2):107–149, 1993.

Kasprzyk-Horden B, Ziolek M, Nawrocki J. Appl. Catal. B. 2003;40:639-669.

Hoffmann MR, Hua I, Hochemer R, Ultrason. Sonochem. 1996;3:S163-S172.

Jain VK. Environ. Sci. Technol.1993;27: 806-808.

Shaw RW, Brill TB, Clifford AA, Eckert CA, Franck EU. Chem. Eng. News. 1991;23-35.

Thomson TB, Modell M. Hazard. Waste.1984;4:453-467.

Adewuyi YG. Sonochemistry: Environmental science & engineering applications. Ind. Eng. Chem.Res.2001; 40:4681-4715.

Ince NH, Tezcanli G, Belen RK, Apikyan IG. Appl. Catal., B. 2001;29:167-176.

Joseph CG, Puma GL, Bono A, Krishnaiah D. Sonophotocatalysis in advanced oxidation process; a short review . Ultrason sonochem. 2009;16:583-90.

Ince NH, Tezcanli G, Belen RK, Apikyan IG. Appl. Catal., B. 2001;49:145-53.

Mahmoodi NM, Arami M, Yousefi N, Limaee N, Salman Tabrizi. Decolorization & aromatic ring degradation kinetics of Direct Red 80 by UV oxidation in the presence of H2O2 utilizing TiO2 as a photo-catalyst , Chem. Eng. J. 2005;112: 191-196.

Suslik KS. Sonochemistry, Science.1990; 247:1439-1445.

Okitsu K, Ashokkumar M, Grieser F. Sonochemical synthesis of gold nanoparticles in water: effects of ultrasound frequency. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005b;109:20673–20675.

Hua I, Hoffmann MR. Kinetics and mechanism of the sonolytic degradation of CCl4: Intermediates and byproducts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996;30:864–871.

OkitsuK, Kawasaki K, Nanzai B, Takenaka N, Bandow H. Effect of carbon tetrachloride on sonochemical decomposition of methyl orange in water, chemosphere.2008;71:36–42.

Sunartio D, Ashokkumar M, Grieser F. Study of the coalescence of acoustic bubbles as a function of frequency, power, and watersoluble additives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6031–6036.